Showcases & Background Setting Bar

Showcases

Background Image

This setting is only taking a look when select color and background.
If you want to set showcase color, background and disable Setting Bar, go to Templates Manager > AT-Templates > Global Tab

 

Critical Care Nutrition at the Clinical Evaluation Research Unit (CERU)

is dedicated to improving nutrition therapies in the critically ill through knowledge generation, synthesis, and translation. We engage in a broad range of research activities and promote a culture of best practices in critical care nutrition. Ultimately, this will result in improved clinical outcomes for critically ill patients and increased efficiencies to our health care systems.

PERFECTIS_logoPERFormance Enhancement of the Canadian nutrition guidelines by a Tailored Implementation Strategy: The PERFECTIS Study

PERFECTIS_Poster_Wanted

Research Team
Naomi E Cahill
Daren K Heyland
Deborah Cook
Lauren Murch
Andrew Day
Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

Background: Tailoring interventions to address identified barriers to change may be an effective strategy to implement guidelines and improve practice. However, none of the previous studies adopting this approach have targeted change in nutrition practice or were conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), therefore there is inadequate data to inform the optimal method or level of tailoring in this setting. Consequently, we conducted the PERFormance Enhancement of the Canadian nutrition guidelines by a Tailored Implementation Strategy (PERFECTIS) study to determine the feasibility of a multifaceted, interdisciplinary, tailored intervention aimed at improving adherence to critical care nutrition guidelines for the provision of enteral nutrition.

Methods: A pretest posttest study was conducted in 7 ICUs from 5 hospitals in North America. The tailored intervention involved a 5 step process 1) nutrition practice audit to evaluate guideline-practice gaps 2) staff survey to identify barriers to enterally feeding patients 3) Focus group meeting to prioritize barriers to target for change 4) Brainstorming to select interventions to overcome the prioritized barriers and 5) a 12 month implementation phase including bi-monthly progress meetings. Compliance with the tailored action plan was determined by the proportion of items in the action plan that were completely implemented. We examined acceptability of the intervention through staff responses to an evaluation questionnaire. In addition, the nutrition practice audit and barriers survey were repeated at the end of the implementation phase to determine changes in barriers and nutrition practices.

Results: All 5 sites successfully completed all aspects of the study. However, their ability to fully implement all of their developed action plans varied from 14 to 75% compliance. Nurses, on average; rated the study-related activities and resources as ‘somewhat useful' and a third of respondents ‘agreed' or ‘strongly agreed' that their nutrition practice had changed as a result of the intervention. We observed a statistically significant 10% (Site range -4.3 to -26.0%) decrease in overall barriers score, and a non-significant 6% (Site range -1.5 to 17.9%) and 4% (-8.3 to 18.2%) increase in the adequacy of total nutrition from calories and protein, respectively.

Conclusions: The results of the PERFECTIS study are promising, indicating that a multifaceted, interdisciplinary tailored approach is feasible. However, the wide variation in the results observed across participating sites suggests that an exploration of the factors associated with successful implementation and refinement of the intervention is required prior to proceeding to test the effectiveness of this approach on a larger scale.

Status: Complete

Funding: AHSC AFP Innovation Fund

Related Publications:

1. Cahill NE, Murch L, Wang M, Day AG, Cook D, Heyland DK. Do barriers to feeding critically ill patients impede nutrition performance? : A multilevel multivariate analysis. BMC Health Service Research. In Press.

2. Cahill NE, Jiang X, Heyland DK. Revised Questionnaire to Assess Barriers to Adequate Nutrition in the Critically ill. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]

3. Cahill NE, Murch L, Cook D, Heyland DK. Implementing a Multifaceted Tailored Intervention to Improve Nutrition Adequacy in Critically Ill Patients: Results of a Multicenter Feasibility Study. Critical Care. 2014;29(4):510-517.

4. Cahill NE, Murch L, Cook D, Heyland DK. Improving the Provision of Enteral Nutrition in the Intensive Care Unit: A Description of a Multifaceted Intervention Tailored to Overcome Local Barriers. Nutr Clin Prac. 2014;29(1):110-117.

5. Cahill NE, Day AG, Cook D, Heyland DK. Development and Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire to Assess Barriers to Feeding Critically Ill Patients Implementation. Science. 2013;8:140.

6. Cahill NE, Murch L, Cook D, Heyland DK. Barriers to feeding critically ill patients: a multicenter survey of critical care nurses. J Crit Care. Dec 2012;27(6):727-734.

Resources:
Barriers Questionnaire (PERFECTIS follow up and INS 2011)

Barriers Questionnaire (Revised 2013)

On behalf of all the research team we would like to thank the staff at the 5 participating hospitals for their dedication and hard work in successfully completing the PERFECTIS study. Please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for any inquiries.

Powered by Amazing-Templates.com 2014 - All Rights Reserved.